PIP Emergency – Act Now!

Silhouetted man on crutchesNote: Submission to HofL Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Cttee re PIP regulations submitted 9 January 2013

On Thursday 13 December, Esther McVey MP, Minister for Disabled People, announced the publication of the draft Personal Independence Payment (PIP) regulations (Note 1) containing the final proposals for PIP. DWP has also published its response to the assessment consultation (Note 2) and a document assessing the impacts of the final proposals (Note 3).

Many of the daily living descriptors have been improved, although there are still issues with some of them. However, we were stunned to see that to be awarded the enhanced mobility component for physical difficulty getting around, and therefore to qualify for Motability, a claimant needs to be unable to walk more than 20 metres – a far shorter distance than the 50 metres given in the consultation draft (Note 4).

An essential element of the PIP assessment is that it should take account of whether claimants can undertake each activity ‘safely, reliably, repeatedly and in a timely manner’. However, the Government has not only decided to roll this phrase into the word ‘reliably’, but has also stated that this will not be included or defined within the regulations themselves. We are concerned this will mean this essential qualifying definition cannot be considered by an appeal tribunal and could be changed by the DWP with ease, at any time.

The Government has, however, listened to concerns about the speed of implementation and the necessity for evaluation and revised its timetable. DLA claimants with indefinite awards will only start to be reassessed from October 2015 – but newer claimants are more likely to have been given time-limited awards and therefore won’t benefit from the delay. However, we have to assume that the criteria published today will eventually affect all DLA claimants, albeit with implementation taking place over a longer timetable, finishing in 2018.

It is clear that those most likely to lose out are physically disabled people with significant walking difficulties who can walk more than 20 metres but less than 50 metres; this problem will be exacerbated by the exclusion of ‘reliably’ etc from the regulations. In fact, DWP’s own projections show that by 2018, when implementation is complete, 428,000 fewer disabled people will be in receipt of the enhanced mobility component of PIP than the number that would be expected to be in receipt of the higher rate mobility component of DLA if it remained as it is now.

Only those with the greatest difficulty getting around, mainly those who use a wheelchair most of the time, will qualify for the Motability scheme on grounds of physical impairment. Many thousands of disabled people with serious musculo-skeletal conditions, serious heart conditions or respiratory difficulties, cerebral palsy, neurological conditions such as MS and ME and many, many more will no longer benefit from the scheme. Their car will simply be taken away before they have a chance to appeal.

Hundreds of thousands of disabled people whose cars are vital to their life and health stand to lose virtually everything. No car = no independence, no job, no salary (with a consequent risk of homelessness), no social life, plus increased dependence on family members, health and social care services and other benefits to survive. This begs the obvious question: how does this cut help disabled people participate in society and contribute by work, volunteering or being involved in their community? Even Paralympians and others held up by the Minister for Disabled People as inspirational role models may have their lives cruelly and unnecessarily restricted.

The PIP criteria for people with a physical difficulty getting around are clearly retrogressive under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, ratified by the UK in 2009. The proposals seriously compromise disabled people’s human rights under several Articles of the Convention, including, among others, the right to live independently and to be included in the community (Article 19) and the right to personal mobility (Article 20).

Further details of the implications of so many losing eligibility for the Motability scheme due to physical difficulties getting around are available at: http://janeyoung.me.uk/2012/12/14/well-over-100000-to-lose-motability-vehicles-under-draconian-new-rules/

Tell your MP how angry and upset you are about the draft PIP regulations!

The Government has said no more changes will be made at this point, although a committee of MP’s still has to vote the regulations through. To help you persuade your MP that these regulations must be changed, we have produced some resources to help:

Notes

  1. The Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2013/9780111532072/contents (See Schedule 1 for the activities and descriptors)
  2. “The Government’s response to the consultation on the Personal Independence Payment assessment criteria and regulations”,  December 2012:  http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-assessment-thresholds-and-consultation-response.pdf
  3. “Personal Independence Payment: Reassessment and Impacts”, December 2012 http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/pip-reassessments-and-impacts.pdf
  4. To get the enhanced mobility component of PIP, you need to accrue 12 points from either the first or second mobility activity in Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the PIP regulations. The first activity (Activity 11 in other DWP documents) covers difficulties with planning or following a journey (generally due to a learning difficulty, sensory impairment or mental health problem) and the second activity (Activity 12 in other DWP documents) covers physical difficulties in getting around. To get 12 points from the second activity alone, you have to be unable to stand then move more than 20 metres. In summary, the criteria mean that if you have no difficulties with planning or following a journey and you can walk more than 20 metres, you will not be awarded the enhanced mobility component and you will not be eligible for the Motability scheme.

 


Comments

PIP Emergency – Act Now! — 47 Comments

  1. I am disgusted that the PIP rulings will yet again make it almost impossible for many severely disabled people to be granted the highest component of PIP, through trickery and cynical changing of the mobility descriptors. This is the final straw of the obscene welfare reforms that are hitting the most vulnerable people and their carers from all sides, this really has to stop now. If this government won’t behave, then let the european courts force them to, under discrimination and human rights law. It would help if the public really knew the truth too, the tories and ATOS are acting in the most inhumane fashion without any regard to human life or decency.

  2. Pingback: If you can only walk twenty metres you’ll get no help | A Latent Existence

  3. I have sent the Disability Rights briefing out with my Christmas cards. Everyone has to know what is happening. Your briefing here is excellent and just what I need to send to my MP and my friends after Christmas.

    I found out from the House of Commons info that the PIP Regs will probably be debated in committee, after which the House can only approve them, not debate them again. Full details of procedure follow:

    “A Statutory Instrument that is going through the affirmative procedure does not have to be considered on the floor of the House although it must be approved by the House. An affirmative procedure SI is likely to be debated in a delegated legislation committee. The future events for these committees can be found through the calendar, general committees tab.

    http://services.parliament.uk/calendar/#!/calendar/Commons/GeneralCommittee/2012/12/21/events.html

    The list of general committees for the following week is published on a Wednesday and will be available through the above link by 3pm.

    The next sitting week information is available at the moment, from the week beginning the 7th January. The SI which you are looking for is not due to be debated in committee that week. The business for the week beginning the 14th January will be announced on the 9th January.

    Once the SI has been debated in committee it will be put to the floor of the House for approval. After it has been debated in committee it is unable to be debated in the chamber. It would just be put to the House for approval.

    There is no specific timetable for delegated legislation under the affirmative procedure.”

  4. You are now seeing the full extent of the criminal acts being committed against the most needy in society sadly IDS and all the other miscreants will never see the inside of a court of justice for their crimes. What I find depressing is when I hear disability groups and charities spokes people say that reform is needed, how foolish they are they are just playing into the hands of those who would destroy as they are the benefit and welfare system of Britain.
    REPEAL THE WELFARE REFORM BILL

  5. This is never going to end is it. On one hand the government anounce that they are going to protect the disabled, yet on the other hand do all that they can to disprove the qualification of recognising disability.. This to me feels like systematic persurcution!

    Is it not time for ‘we’ the “disabled community” to band together & attempt a class action law suit against the government? If anything, perhaps we can delay the changes? Whilst also alerting the world to the growing situation.. We have a voice, it’s time we used it..!!!

  6. …..and the point of all the hours spent on the consultation……..? But then that’s no great surprise and at least they can’t pretend everyone agreed/agrees with all their criteria and reforms.

    I haven’t had time to read all of it yet, but the absence of “safely, reliably, repeatedly and timely” being defined in the regulations despite it being stressed as essential in the consultation says it all really. And 2 buses lengths? Maybe they really mean bendy buses!

    I had an early present this week from ATOS – my ESA50. Given Christmas etc. there is only just over 3 weeks before it has to be posted back. So for now my energies etc. will have to focus on this, I’m afraid.

    But then my MP is unsympathetic and inactive in matters of disability support, so it will make little difference whether or not I email her – it hasn’t to date, despite many letters/emails. (She’s a member of the shadow cabinet after all, so what do I expect?)

    Good will to all? Only those who are able, affluent and arrogant…..

  7. PLEASE VOTE THEM OUT BEFORE I COMMIT SUICIDE …… I stay alive for my grownup daughter who is very ILL ………. Please speak out loud…

  8. DONT EMAIL THE LETTER

    POST IT !!!

    YOUR MP WILL THINK YOU MORE SERIOUS IF
    YOU MAIL IT TO THEM

    IT SAYS THAT YOU TOOK THE TIME TO PRINT IT

    AND GO TO THE MAIL BOX TO POST IT.

    SENDING IT MY EMAIL SAYS THAT YOU ARE NOT SO

    SERIOUS AND THAT YOU COULD NOT BE BOTHERED TO LEAVE YOUR PC OR LAPTOP

  9. Just to suggest people draw this to their MP’s attention to represent in the Opposition’s day in the commons for Pat’s debate which they have agreed to take up – see http://carerwatch.com/reform/?p=1246

    Let’s all act together about both the individual effects and the cumulative impact of all the measures being taken – see the Campaign’s Manifesto for some of the cumulative issues and get your MP to pledge to attend and represent your views

  10. I have another major problem with these regulations that people seem to be failing to pick up on.

    People with severe mental illness or major depression can score almost nothing from this test because there is no descriptor for continuous supervision to prevent self-harm or self-neglect, risky behaviour or suicide. That is the impression I get from what I have read. Someone receiving the high rate of care on the DLA test can qualify for nothing under the PIP regulations.

    Just because someone is not going to attempt to harm themselves while taking a bath, does not mean they will not harm themselves while not doing any specific activity. The government is mistaken to think that independent living is strictly about being able to carry out specific activities.

    “The proposals seriously compromise disabled people’s human rights under several Articles of the Convention, including, among others, the right to live independently and to be included in the community (Article 19)…”

    It seems to me that the continuous supervision descriptor being omitted is also direct threat to someone with mental illness living independently and in the community.

    • I agree – there are several ways in which the regs let us down by failing to acknowledge that not all needs are related to ‘doing things’. Your example is one of the worst of such failings. My view is that the regs have been designed by someone who doesn’t understand that life is about ‘being’ as well as ‘doing’.

  11. Thank you, Admin, and you have put it better than I have!

    Surely they are aware that a significant amount of people currently qualify for DLA because there is a proven and direct risk of their life if they are left without continuous supervision or care?

    It has to be blatantly obvious to them that those lives will now be significant risk. Their carers will also no longer qualify for Carers Allowance either to care for them.

    How can they justify this? It is beyond neglectful. I wish they could be held accountable for every life that will be lost as a direct result of these regulations.

  12. Pingback: Well over 100,000 to lose Motability vehicles under draconian new rules | Jane Young

  13. Pingback: How welfare reform will take away my independence (video) | Jane Young

  14. Pingback: When The Cared For Becomes The Carer, A Double Blow In Benifit Cuts. « Ramblings of a Fibro Fogged Mind

  15. You really make it seem really easy together with your presentation but I in finding this matter to be actually something that I believe I might never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I am having a look ahead in your subsequent post, I will attempt to get the dangle of it!

  16. I have read through the “Submission to House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee re PIP regulations” document that this website has submitted.

    The document only specifies that there are TWO “specific and important” areas to be brought up. They are indeed important but other important areas that will affect many disabled people, including those with serious mental illness were ignored.

    This made for uncomfortable reading because the whole existence of We Are Spartacus was to represent Disabled people’s views on welfare reform, but does not do so in that submission despite the strong usage of ‘we’ are ‘our’.

    I’m not sure why the Administrators have only exclusively covered the areas involving the single mobility descriptor and the ‘reliably’ element since the final proposals were published. This article seems to imply that those issues alone that are causing the “PIP Emergency” — they are not.

    Please, We Are Spartacus, don’t overlook the others.

    • I’m sorry you are not comfortable with our submission. We did indeed analyse the whole of the Government’s response to the consultation, but at this late stage, when we stand very, very little chance of having any influence, we had to concentrate on the two issues which appear to be the most serious and affect the largest number of people. This is always a controversial thing to do, but the need for the definitions of safely, reliably, repeatedly and in a timely manner to have the full force of law is of prime importance to all claimants, regardless of type of impairment or the activity being considered. Most, but we accept not all, of the daily living descriptors and the planning and following a journey descriptors have been either left as they were in the consultation draft or improved.

      It was in our response to the consultation where we endeavoured to be as inclusive as possible, although we have never claimed to be perfect! Most charities seem to have given up the fight at this stage, but at least we are doing our best to draw politicians’ attention to the biggest problems with the regulations.

      The scrutiny timetable for the regulations is so tight that it has not been possible to survey our supporters to gain a range of views at this stage. I think I should also point out that we are but a very small number of sick & disabled people, none of whom are actually well enough to work, so our capacity to take on board a very wide range if concerns in a short time period is extremely limited. We can only do what we can do, and that’s no more than any other sick or disabled person can do. We do not seek to provide all the answers or to undertake what impairment-specufic charities, with ay least some funding, can do.

  17. Pingback: We are Spartacus » Blog Archive » Emergency Stop

  18. My MP Robert Buckland – (Swindon Is True Tory MP and IS Just Not Interested I Tried With ESA to Wake Him Up To No Avail – I am Very Poorly bedridden and was hoping someone could write to this MP as well? I am so scared for our futures :(

  19. Pingback: The People’s Review of the Work Capability Assessment: WE ARE SPARTACUS Disabled people’s views on welfare reform « HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL

  20. Pingback: PIP Emergency – Act Now! WE ARE SPARTACUS Disabled people’s views on welfare reform « HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL

  21. Pingback: Spartacus campaign releases Emergency Stop Report | The Hardest Hit

  22. Pingback: We are Spartacus >> PIP FACTSHEET >>Disabled people’s views on welfare reform « HUMAN RIGHTS & POLITICAL JOURNAL

  23. This is very scary stuff, I am only of average intelligence with deteriorateing health and my husband who is my care giver cannot even fill a form in,we both would be nearing our pension age if the goal post had not been moved.
    We live on a mountain in the Welsh valleys even our main high street is on an incline we have no roads that are on the flat,I have until march 2014 left on my higher rate mobility claim and to lose my Mobility Car entitlement would condem me to being virtually house bound, I do have a mobility scooter but this limits me to short distances and the mercy of the weather, My mobility payments help cover the running costs of my scooter electricity usage and repairs.
    From i have read on your pages so far, my future is looking very bleak.
    So please all who can do something for Disabled Rights keep fighting our corner and count me as one of your supporters albiet a depend supporter. Thank you.

  24. Disability fakers are everywhere – it’s easy to spot them! Next time you’re at the supermarket, just look at the disabled parking area. One or two will be in wheelchairs or struggle to walk, but the vast majority have no trouble walking & shopping – they condemn themselves by their actions!

  25. hi i think you’ve missed all the disabled people who have cancer but can walk plus other physical imparment’s you don’t need to be i a wheel chair to be disabled

    • Hi Chris – not missed them, just focused on the worst aspects of the regs now they’ve been published. Cancer patients would also need the words ‘reliably, repeatedly, safely and in a timely manner’to be legally enforceable – so they’re applied consistently to all activities and descriptors including the 10 relating to daily living as well as the 2 relating to mobility.

  26. with people like ed scott what chance does any one stand try living with a terminal illness or a disability you muppet 0.5 % fakers speaks for itself

  27. im in the process at the min have sent a letter to my mp i had a letter dated 18 jan saying they would be ringing me then this morning the dreaded call asking if i would answer their questionare over the phone i said no send it out .im copd close to stage 3 and my dla is used for my transport which without im stuck in home i need my vehicle as its my only way of getting out and about but fear i could lose it ,even tho copd is a terminal illness i cant see me being dead within 6 months so wont meet that particular element its a joke

  28. Pingback: Disability benefit changes – your stories | The best worldwide news for u

  29. Pingback: Disability Benefit Changes – Your Stories | Welfare News Service

  30. Hi all I got my response to PIP emergency letter today does anyone want to see it or for me to post the response it’s a typical fob off email but I’m not sure how to respond back plz help thanks

  31. Pingback: Welfare reform and the vilification of the ‘undeserving poor’ – Society Central

  32. Hi I have wrote something already but i don’t know if it as gone on.

    Anyway I have read all what people have said and i agree with everything,
    But don’t the government realize that most people, the genuine one’s will
    of been seen by there dr’s and consultants as i have, so that to me means
    the government would be going against them, has i understand the ATOS are
    not qualified in any shape or form as dr’s or consultants..

  33. The Gov’t proposal of cutting benefit flies in the face of the United Nations convention on human rights of persons with disabilities, if they get a away with it…this is brutal and without compassion…it has to be stopped or reversed. REPEAL THE WELFARE REFORM BILL.

  34. To the imbeciles like ED Scott above, the one thing that stands out about his post is his utter ignorance, it’s obvious he’s zero idea of disability, and he caused an affront to his own intelligence to post that ridiculous comment. He has no idea what’s waiting round the corner for him, I worked full time and stopped to get some petrol one afternoon when another from the imbecile club hit me with her car. I really hope Mr Scott that you don’t have an accident, or get ill, you will then see what it’s like just to exist never mind have a life. Never mind, you can always come on here and slag someone off like the DWP to ATOS and you won’t be judged for it.

  35. You can pay your rent and keep your home. You may get a huge bill or threats but at the end of the day if you cant pay this unfair tax then they cant boot you out.Tell the govt if they will give up their second homes then you will give up your second bedroom.

  36. To Ed Scott…who says he can spot “Disability Fakers everywhere”………… all I can say is im very glad that youre not my GP. I assume you ARE a GP arnt you?, it takes a doctor to diagnose disability you see, and you must be a very good one to be able to spot us at fifty yards!

    For your info, all disabled people dont have wheelchairs or crutches… im not going to lower myself to educate you, but I suggest you educate yourself before you make comments like that again.
    I got out of my car once and a man suggested I wasnt disabled….. my son then joined us, and the man came off worse in the “Discussion” that ensued. [Edited by admin]

  37. i think all goverments sign a contract BEFORE getting our votes explaining what there polocies are that way they cant lie and if they break that contract then there out

  38. I live like Susan Vokes, at the top end of a Welsh valley above the “snow line”. To get anywhere you have to go up then down, up then down “ad infinitum”, when you have difficulty walking this means that you are effectively stranded even with a wheelchair and with out the mobility benefit you are set to starve in your own home.
    As for Mr Ed Scott, do not blame him for his views, as he has been programmed by the constant haranging of the disabled by the tory propaganda machine, but in saying this perhaps he would like to come to Wales for a short holiday and bring with him IDS and talk about their views in a local pub, I am sure they would then experience severe disability themselves




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>